.png)
.png)
.png)
Email this article 
The optimal choice of hydrodynamic models to assess the impact of climate change on the cryosphere
https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2013-1-83-92
Abstract
This study is targeted at narrowing the range of uncertainties in predictive cryospheric modeling associated with climatic projections. We used the output from 36 CMIP5 GCM runs for the period 1976–2005 and calculated trends of several climatic characteristics that largely govern the state of the cryosphere, i.e. seasonal and mean annual air temperature, thawing degree-day sums, annual and winter precipitation sums. Data from 744 weather stations were used to identify and delineate 17 regions, which demonstrate coherent temperature changes in the past decades. Results from GCMs and observations were averaged over the «coherent regions» and compared with each other. Ultimately, we evaluated the skills of individual CMIP5 GCMs, ranked them in the specific context of predictive cryospheric modeling, identified top-end models in each of the 17 regions and eliminated the outliers. Selected top-end GCMs were used to compose optimal regional ensembles that were compared with the ensemble consisting of all available models. An optimal ensemble was also constructed for the area underlain by permafrost in Russia. Results indicate that the all-model ensemble in most regions underestimates the projected temperature changes compared to the optimal ensemble. Elimination of the outliers narrows the range of uncertainty in regional climate projection by 5–20%.
About the Authors
O. A. AnisimovRussian Federation
V. A. Kokorev
Russian Federation
References
1. Anisimov O.A., Lobanov V.A., Reneva S.A. Analysis of air temperature changes at the Russian territory and empiric prediction for the first quarter of 21st century. Meteorologiya i gidrologiya. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2007, 10: 20–30. [In Russian].
2. Anisimov O.A., Zhiltsova E.L., Kokorev V.A. Spatial and temporal peculiarities of the air temperature dynamics at the Russian territory in 20th – beginning of 21st centuries. Problemy ecologicheskogo monitoringa i modelirovaniya ekosistem. Problems of ecological monitoring and modeling of ecosystems. 2011, 24: 83–98. [In Russian].
3. Anisimov O.A., Zhiltsova E.L., Reneva S.A. Assessment of critical levels of climate influence to the natural ecosystems of land at the Russian territory. Meteorologiya i gidrologiya. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2011, 11: 31–41. [In Russian].
4. Anisimov O.A., Zhiltsova E.L. On estimations of climate change in regions of Russia in XX and beginning of XXI centuries according to the observations data. Meteorologiya i gidrologiya. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2012, 6: 95–107. [In Russian].
5. Govorkova V.A., Katsov V.M., Meleshko V.P., Pavlova T.V., Shkolnik I.M. Estimation of suitability of general circulation models in atmosphere and ocean CMIP3 for the calculation of future climate changes in Russia. Meteorologiya i gidrologiya. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2008, 8: 5–20. [In Russian].
6. Gruza G.V., Rankova E.Ya., Aristova L.N., Kleshchenko L.K. On the vagueness of some scenarios in climatic predictions of air temperature and precipitation on the territory of Russia. Meteorologiya i gidrologiya. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2006, 10: 5–23. [In Russian].
7. Gruza G.V., Rankova E.Ya., Rocheva E.V. Climate change on the territory of Russia: air temperature and atmospheric precipitation. Izmeneniya klimata: vliyanie vnezennykh i zemnykh faktorov. Izmenenie okruzhayushchey sredy i klimata. Prirodnye i svyazannye s nimi tekhnogennye katastrofy. Climate changes: influence of extraterrestrial and terrestrial factors. Change of environment and climate. Natural and connected technogenic catastrophes. Ed. G.S. Golitsyn. Moscow: Institute of Physics of Atmosphere, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2008: 11–23. [In Russian].
8. Gruza G.V., Rankova E.Ya. Assessment of coming climate changes on the territory of Russian Federation. Meteorologiya i gidrologiya. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2009, 11: 5–29. [In Russian].
9. Meleshko V.P., Katsov V.M., Mirvis V.M., Govorkova V.A., Pavlova T.V. Climate in Russia in 21st century. Pt. 1. New evidences of anthropogenic climate changes and present-day possibilities of their calculations. Meteorologiya i gidrologiya. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2008, 6: 5–20. [In Russian].
10. Sherstyukov A.B. Correlation of ground temperature with air temperature and snow depth at the territory of Russia. Kriosfera Zemli. Earth Cryosphere. 2008, 7 (1): 79–87. [In Russian].
11. Sherstyukov A.B. Izmeneniya klimata I ikh posledstviya v zone mnogoletney verzloty Rossii. Climate changes and their sequences in the Russian zone of permafrost. Obninsk, VNIIGMI – IDC, 2009: 127 p. [In Russian].
12. Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic: SWIPA 2011, Executive Summary. Oslo: AMAP, 2011: 397 p.
13. Gardner A.S., Sharp M. Influence of the Arctic circumpolar vortex on the mass balance of Canadian high Arctic glaciers. Journ. of Climate. 2007, 20 (18): 4586–4598.
14. Hock R., Radic V., de Woul M. Climate sensitivity of Storglaciaren, Sweden: an intercomparison of mass-balance models using ERA-40 re-analysis and regional climate model data. Annals of Glaciology. 2007, 46 (1): 342–348.
15. Knutti R. The end of model democracy? Climatic Change. 2010, 102 (3–4): 395–404.
16. Koerner R.M. Mass balance of glaciers in the Queen Elizabeth Islands, Nunavut, Canada. Annals of Glaciology. 200, 42 (1): 417–423.
17. Meehl G.A., Covey C., McAvaney B., Latif M., Stouffer R.J. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 2005, 86: 89–93.
18. Meehl G.A., Covey C., Delworth T.L., Latif M., McAveney B., Mitchell J.F.B., Stouffer R.J., Taylor K. E. The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: A new era in climate change research. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 2007, 88. doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383.
19. Oerlemans J., Bassford R.P., Chapman W., Dowdeswell J.A., Glazovsky A.F., Hagen J.O., Melvold K., de Ruyter de Wildt M.,van de Wal R.S.W. Estimating the contribution of Arctic glaciers to sea-level change in the next 100 years. Annals of Glaciology. 2005, 42 (1): 230–236.
20. Radic V., Hock R. Modeling future glacier mass balance and volume changes using ERA-40 reanalysis and climate models: A sensitivity study at Storglaciaren, Sweden. Journ. of Geophys. Research, 2006, 111 (F3): F03003.
21. Radic V., Hock R. Regionally differentiated contribution of mountain glaciers and ice caps to future sea-level rise. Nature Geosciences. Nature Publishing Group. 2011, 4 (2): 91–94.
22. Tailor K.E., Stouffer R.J., Meehl G.A. An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 2012, 93: 485–498.
23. Walsh J.E., Anisimov O., Hagen J.O.M., Jakobsson T., Oerlemans J., Prowse T.D., Romanovsky V., Savelieva N., Serreze M., Shiklomanov I., Solomon S. Cryosphere and Hydrology, Arctic Climate Impacts Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005: 183–242.
24. De Woul M., Hock R. Static mass-balance sensitivity of Arctic glaciers and ice caps using a degree-day approach. Annals of Glaciology. 2005, 42 (1): 217–224.
Supplementary files
For citation: Anisimov O.A., Kokorev V.A. The optimal choice of hydrodynamic models to assess the impact of climate change on the cryosphere. Ice and Snow. 2013;53(1):83-92. https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2013-1-83-92
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2076-6734 (Print)
ISSN 2412-3765 (Online)