.png)
.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Influence of the snow–soil contact conditions on the depth of ground freezing (based on observations in the Kursk region)
https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2019-2-407
Abstract
The results of measurements of the ground freezing under a snow cover do not always agree with the calculations. The reason for this may be variability of thermal characteristics of the snow cover which properties depend on the landscape features. One of probable reasons may be also the incomplete contact between the snow cover and the soil. In autumn, the ground surface is usually covered with fallen leaves or withered grass. Estimates show that, in the presence of such layer on the soil surface, the air gap between snow and soil with the 1 cm thickness has a thermal protection capacity equal to the value of a 10‑centimeter thick layer of snow. Sometimes the presence of local gaps in the snow-soil interface can also be caused by other reason, for example, the spontaneous downfall of a depth hoar layer. The results of field measurements of snow cover characteristics, ground freezing depths and investigation of the contact conditions at the snow-soil interface carried out in different landscapes are presented. The results of mathematical modeling showed that when the air gap between snow and soil is taken into account the calculated values of depth of ground freezing are in a good agreement with data of the measurements. This consideration is especially important for small thicknesses of snow cover with high density and thermal conductivity. Numerical experiments did also show that the snow hardness is the necessary characteristic for analysis of the snow cover state. This provides more accurate estimating of the snow thermal conductivity that is closely connected with its hardness.
About the Authors
V. M. KotlyakovRussian Federation
Moscow
A. V. Sosnovsky
Russian Federation
Moscow
R. A. Chernov
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Pavlov A.V. Monitoring kriolitozony. Monitoring of Permafrost. Novosibirsk: Geo Publishers, 2008: 229 p. [In Russian].
2. Sherstyukov A.B. Correlation of soil temperature with air temperature and snow cover depth in Russia. Kriosfera Zemli. Cryosphere of the Earth. 2008, ХП (1): 79–87. [In Russian].
3. Gisnas K., Westermann S., Schuler T.V., Litherland T., Isaksen K., Boike J., Etzelmuller B. A statistical approach to represent small-scale variability of permafrost temperatures due to snow cover. The Cryosphere. 2014, 8: 2063–2074.
4. Osokin N.I., Sosnovskiy A.V. Impact of dynamics of air temperature and snow cover thickness on the ground freezing. Kriosfera Zemli. Cryosphere of the Earth. 2015, 19 (1): 99–105. [In Russian].
5. Osokin N.I., Sosnovsky A.V., Nakalov P.R., Nenashev S.V. Thermal resistance of snow cover and its influence to the ground freezing. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2013, 53 (1): 93–103. [In Russian].
6. Pinzer B.R., Schneebeli M. Snow metamorphism under alternating temperature gradients: Morphology and recrystallization in surface snow. Geophys. Research Letters. 2009, 36: L23503. doi: 10.1029/2009GL039618.
7. Kamata Y., Sokratov S.A., Sato A. Temperature and temperature gradient dependence of snow recrystallization in depth hoar snow. Advances in Cold Regions Thermal Engineering and Sciences. Еds. K..Hutter, Y..Wang, H..Beer. Verlag: Springer, 1999: 395–402.
8. Osokin N.I., Sosnovsky A.V., Chernov R.A. Influence of snow cover stratigraphy on its thermal resistance. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2013, 53 (3): 63–70. doi: 10.15356/2076-6734-2013-3-63-70. [In Russian].
9. Kitaev I.M., Ableeva V.A., Asainova Z.A., Zheltukhin A.S., Korobov E.D. Seasonal dynamics of air temperature, snow storage and soil freezing in Central part of the East European Plain. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2017, 57 (4): 518–526. doi: https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-67342017-4-518-526. [In Russian].
10. Florent Domine, Mathieu Barrere, and Denis Sarrazin Seasonal evolution of the effective thermal conductivity of the snow and the soil in high Arctic herb tundra at Bylot Island, Canada // The Cryosphere. 2016, 10: 2573–2588. www.the-ryosphere.net/10/2573/2016/doi:10.5194/tc-10-2573-2016
11. Tishkov A.A., Osokin N.I., Sosnovskiy A.V. The Impact of Moss synusia on the active layer of arctic soil and subsoil. Izvestiya Ross. Akad. Nauk, Seriya Geogr. Proc. of the RAS, Geographical Series. 2013, 3: 39–46.
12. Sturm M., Holmgren J., Konig M., Morris K. The thermal conductivity of seasonal snow. Journ. of Glaciology. 1997, 43 (143): 26–41.
13. Osokin N.I., Sosnovskiy A.V., Chernov R.A. Effective thermal conductivity of snow and its variations. Kriosfera Zemli. Cryosphere of the Earth. 2017, XXI (3): 60–68. doi: 10.21782/KZ1560-7496-2017-3(60-68). [In Russian].
14. Fierz C., Armstrong R.L., Durand Y., Etchevers P., Green E., McClung D.M., Nishimura K., Satyawali P.K., Sokratov S.A. The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground: IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology. IACS Contribution № 1. Paris: UNESCO–IHP. 2009, 83: 80 p.
15. Kotlyakov V.M., Sosnovsky A.V., Osokin N.I. Estimation of thermal conductivity of snow by its density and hardness in Svalbard. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2018, 58 (3): 343–352. doi: https://doi.org/10.15356/20766734-2018-3-343-352. [In Russian].
16. Osokin N.I., Sosnovskiy A.V. Influence of temperature and dynamics of snow cover on the ground freezing. Kriosfera Zemli. Earth Cryosphere. 2015, XIX (1): 99– 105. [In Russian].
17. Building Code. SNiP 2.02.04–88. Osnovaniya i fundamenty na vechnomerzlyh gruntah. Basements and Foundations in Permafrost. GUP TCPP. Moscow, 1997: 52 p. [In Russian].
Supplementary files
For citation: Kotlyakov V.M., Sosnovsky A.V., Chernov R.A. Influence of the snow–soil contact conditions on the depth of ground freezing (based on observations in the Kursk region). Ice and Snow. 2019;59(2):182-190. https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2019-2-407
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2076-6734 (Print)
ISSN 2412-3765 (Online)