FACTORS AFFECTING THE CONDITIONS OF SULFATE REDUCTION AND MERCURY METHYLATION IN THE RIVER AMUR ICE


https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2018-1-105-116

Full Text:




Abstract

Results of the layer-by-layer studies of distribution of organic matter (OM) and mercury in ice cores sampled from the Amur River near the Khabarovsk city: its mainstream and the Pemzenskaya and Amurskaya branches, are presented. Comprehensive investigation of ice performed at the end of the freeze-up period allows making a retrospective analysis of the river ecosystem pollution during winter. Analysis of the total content of dissolved organic substances and aromatic compounds, determining a level of humification of the aquatic environment, was carried out with a spectrophotometer Shimadzu UV-3600 at 254 and 275 nm. The mercury content was determined by inductively coupled plasmamass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The number of cultured heterotrophic bacteria, sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and their resistance to mercury (0.0005 and 0.001 mg/L) were used as indicators of biogeochemical processes going on in vitro. The maximum resistance to mercury at concentration of 0.001 mg/l was revealed from the sulfate-reducing bacteria in cores taken from the upper ice layer (0-10 cm) near the right bank of the Amurskaya branch. Periodical high mercury contamination of ice (up to 0.71 mkg/L) is estimated as a risk factor. In Pemzenskoy branch, the main factors for the mercury methylation in the ice were fine detritus, coming at the reservoir discharges, and the SRB resistant to mercury. These microorganisms were found in upper layers of the ice (10-35 cm) near the left bank and in the middle of the water stream (60–80 cm). A layer of ice (70–117 cm) with conditions also favourable for the sulfate reduction and the mercury methylation had been revealed in the mainstream of the Amur River near its right bank that is the cross-boundary area in the zone of influence of the Songhua river runoff. Among these conditions are high levels of OM, the presence of heterotrophic bacteria, which are destructors of high-molecular compounds, the potential producers of metabolites with methyl radicals, and the activity of the SRB resistant to mercury.


About the Authors

L. M. Kondratyeva
Institute of Water and Ecological Problems, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



D. V. Andreeva
Institute of Water and Ecological Problems, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



E. M. Golubeva
Institute of Tectonics and Geophysics, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



References

1. Moiseenko T.I. Mercury in the hydrosphere. Rtut' v biosfere. Mercury in the biosphere: ecogeochemical aspects. Novosibirsk: Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2010: 19–24. [In Russian].

2. Suchenko S.A. The possibility of mercury methylation and bioaccumulation in the reservoir of the projected Katun hydro power. Vodnye resursy. Water Resources. 1995, 22 (1): 78–84. [In Russian].

3. Frohne T., Rinklebe J., Langer U., Du Laing G., Mothes S., Wennrich R. Biogeochemical factors affecting mercury methylation rate in two contaminated floodplain soils. Biogeosciences, 2012, 9: 493–507. doi: 10.5194/bg-9-493-2012.

4. Eckley C.S., Hintelmann H. Determination of mercury methylation potentials in the water column of lakes across Canada. Science Total Environmental. 2006, 368: 111–125. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.042.

5. Li P., Feng X., Qiu G. Methylmercury exposure and health effects from rice and fish consumption: A review. Intern. Journ. of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2010, 7: 2666–2691. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7062666.

6. Skyllberg U., Qian J., Frech W., Xia K., Bleam W.F. Distribution of mercury, methyl mercury and organic sulphur species in soil, soil solution and stream of a boreal forest catchment. Biogeochemistry. 2003, 64: 53–76.

7. Steffen A., Douglas T., Amyot M., Narayan J., Fuentes J.D. A synthesis of atmospheric mercury depletion event chemistry in the atmosphere and snow. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2008, 8: 1445–1482. doi.: org/10.5194/acp-8-1445-2008.

8. Constant P., Poissant L., Villemur R., Yumvihoze E., Lean D. Fate of inorganic mercury and methyl mercury within the snow cover in the low arctic tundra on the shore of Hudson Bay (Que´bec, Canada). Journ. of Geophys. Research: Atmospheres. 2007, 112 (8): 1–10. doi: 10.1029/2006JD007961.

9. Durnford D., Dastoor A. The behavior of mercury in the cryosphere: A review of what we know from observations. Journ. of Geophys. Research: Oceans. 2011, 116: 1–30. doi: 10.1029/2010JD014809.

10. Kerin E.J., Gilmour C.C., Roden E., Suzuki M.T., Coates J.D., Mason R.P. Mercury methylation by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006, 72: 7919–7921. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01602-06.

11. Feyte S., Tessier A., Gobeil C., Cossa D. In situ adsorption of mercury, methylmercury and other elements by iron oxyhydroxides and organic matter in lake sediments. Applied Geochemistry. 2010, 25: 984–995, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.04.005.

12. Ermakov V.V. Biogenic migration and detoxicity of mercury. Rtut' v biosfere. Mercury in the biosphere: ecogeochemical aspects. Moscow: Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2010: 5–14. [In Russian].

13. Sokolova E.A. Influence of temperature on development of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the laboratory and field in winter. Sibirskiy ecologicheskiy zhurnal. Siberian Ecological Journal. 2010, 6: 865–869. [In Russian].

14. Roh Y., Gao H., Vali H., Kennedy D.W., Yang Z.K., Gao W., Dohnalkova A.C., Stapleton R.D., Moon J.-W., Phelps T.J., Fredrickson J.K., Zhou J. Metal reduction and iron biomineralization by a psychrotolerant Fe(III)-Reducing bacterium, Shewanella sp. Strain PV-4. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006, 72 (5): 3236–3244. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.5.32363244.2006.

15. Podar M., Gilmour C.C., Brandt C.C., Soren A., Brown S.D., Crable B.R., Palumbo A.V., Somenahally A.C, Elias D.A. Global prevalence and distribution of genes and microorganisms involved in mercury methylation. Science Advances. 2015, 1 (9): 1–12. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500675. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500675.

16. Acha D., Pabo C.A., Hintelmann H. Mercury methylation and hydrogen sulfide production among unexpected strains isolated from periphyton of two macrophytes of the Amazon. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2012, 80 (3): 637–645. doi: 10.1111/j.15746941.2012.01333.x.

17. Gilmour C.C., Podar M., Bullock A.L., Graham A.M., Brown S.D., Somenahally A.C., Johs A., Hurt Jr.R.A., Bailey K.L., Elias D.A. Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments. Environmental Science and Technology. 2013, 47 (20): 11810– 11820. doi: 10.1021/es403075t.

18. Beattie S.A., Armstrong D., Chaulk A., Comte J., Gosselin M., Wang F. Total and methylated mercury in Arctic multiyear sea ice. Environmental Science and Technology. 2014, 48 (10): 5575−5582. doi: 10.1021/es5008033.

19. Barkay T., Poulain A.J. Mercury (micro)biogeochemistry in polar environments. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2007, 59: 232–241. doi: 10.1111/j.15746941.2006.00246.x.

20. Loseto L.L., Lean D.R., Siciliano S.D. Snowmelt sources of methylmercury to High Arctic ecosystems. Environmental Science and Technology. 2004, 38 (11): 3004–3010. doi.: 10.1021/es035146n.

21. Moskvichenko D.V., Babushkin A.G. Peculiarities on formation of chemical composition of snow waters (on example of Khanty-Mansi autonomous district). Kriosfera Zemli. Earth Cryosphere. 2012, XVI (1): 71–81 [In Russian].

22. Moller A.K., Barkay T., Al-Soud W.A., Sørensen S.J., Kroer H.S.N. Diversity and characterization of mercury-resistant bacteria in snow, fresh water and seaice brine from the High Arctic. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2011, 75 (3): 390–401. doi: 10.1111/j.15746941.2010.01016.x.

23. Rivkina E.M., Friedmann E.I., McKay C.P., Gilichinsky D.A. Metabolic activity of permafrost bacteria below the freezing point. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000, 66: 3230–3233. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3230-3233.2000.

24. Kot F. Heavy metals in the bottom sediments of Middle and Lower Amur River. Biokhimicheskie i ekologocheskie otsenki technogennykh ekosistem basseyna reki Amur. Biogeochemical and ecological estimates of anthropogenic ecosystems in the Amur River basin. Vladivostok: Dal'nauka, 1994: 123–135. [In Russian].

25. Kondratyeva L.M. Andreeva D.V., Golubeva E.M. Influence of large tributaries on biogeochemical processes in the Amur River. Geografija i prirodnye resursy. Geography and Natural Resources. 2013, 2: 36–46 [In Russian].

26. Jiang G.-B., Shi J.-B., Feng X.-B. Mercury pollution in China: An overview of the past and current sources of the toxic metal. Environmental Science and Technology. 2006, 40 (12): 3673–3678. doi: 10.1021/es062707c.

27. Zhang Z.S., Sun X.J., Wang Q.C., Zheng D.M., Zheng N., Lu X.G. Recovery from Mercury contamination in the Second Songhua River, China. Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 2010, 211: 219–229. doi: 10.1007/s11270-009-0294-3.

28. Kondratyeva L.M. Geoecological studies of river ice. Geoekologiya. Inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya. Geoecology. Engineering Geology. Hydrogeology. Geocryology. 2010, 6: 511–520. [In Russian].

29. Kondratyeva L.M, Zhukov A.G. Spatio-temporal effects of Amur River ice pollution with organic substances. Proc. of the 3rd Intern. Meeting of Amur-Okhotsk Consortium-2013 in collaboration with the Conf. on «Sustainable Nature Management in Coastal Areas». 2014: 45–48. http://amurokhotsk.com/.

30. Thomas O., Burgess C. UV-visible spectrophotometry of water and wastewater. Elsevier, 2007: 360 р.

31. Kondratyeva L.M., Bardyuk L.M., Zhukov A.G. Accumulation and transformation of toxic substances in the ice of the Amur River and Songhua River after a anthropogenic accident in China in 2005. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2011, 4: 118–124. [In Russian].

32. Kondratyeva L.M., Fisher N.K. Microbiological research of ice on the Amur and Songhua Rivers. Kriosfera Zemli. Earth Cryosphere. 2012, XVI (1): 82–93. [In Russian].

33. Andreeva D.V., Kondratуeva L.M., Stukova O.Yu. Microbiological research of sulfate reduction in Zeya Reservoir. Tstcteniya pamyati Vladimira Yakovlevicha Levanidova. Vladimir Ya. Levanidov’s Biennial Memorial Meetings. V. 6. Vladivostok: Dal'nauka, 2014: 32–37. [In Russian].

34. Vorob'eva I.B., Naprasnikova E.V., Vlasova M.V. Ecogeochemical specifics of snow, ice and ice water in the southern part of Lake Baikal. Geoekologija. Inzhenernaya geologiya. Gidrogeologiya. Geokriologiya. Geoecology. Engineering geology, hydrogeology, and geocryology. 2009, 1: 54–60. [In Russian].


Supplementary files

For citation: Kondratyeva L.M., Andreeva D.V., Golubeva E.M. FACTORS AFFECTING THE CONDITIONS OF SULFATE REDUCTION AND MERCURY METHYLATION IN THE RIVER AMUR ICE. Ice and Snow. 2018;58(1):105-116. https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2018-1-105-116

Views: 950

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2076-6734 (Print)
ISSN 2412-3765 (Online)