Public perception of climate change in the cold regions of Russia: an example of Yakutia


https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2017-4-565-574

Full Text:




Abstract

The rate of climate change in the Russian cold regions is nearly twice larger than the global‑mean rate. Besides climate risks, such changes lead to new possibilities, which require scientifically based regional adaptation strategies. Climate could be viewed as an inexhaustible public resource that creates opportuni‑ ties for sustainable development. Long‑term trends show that climate as a resource is becoming more read‑ ily available in the cold regions, notwithstanding the general perception that globally climate change is one of the challenges of the 21st century. Adaptation strategies are required for balancing the risks and potential benefits resulting from the changing climate. Success of such strategies depends on the public perception of climate change. This study compares the observational data on climate and environmental changes with the results of the public survey conducted in Yakutia in the period 2012–2017. The survey involved nearly 2000 respondents in several cities and 2 villages (Ust‑Maja, Saskhulakh) representing different economical, socio‑ logical, permafrost, vegetation, and climatic conditions. Results indicated that public perception of the climatic and environmental changes is not univocal, and depends on many factors. Low probability extreme events, such as unusual weather patterns or abrupt land‑ scape changes may have greater effect than the long‑term climate trends. Currently less than half of the pop‑ ulation in Yakutia consider climate change as an established fact, and are ready to take actions in this regard. Meanwhile, Yakutia is a region where observational records demonstrate the most pronounced changes in climatic regime compared to other Russian regions. The contrast between the actual changes and public per‑ ception of such changes has important implication for developing adaptation strategies. To be effective, such strategies should combine knowledge coming from instrumental‑ and model‑based analysis of the climatic and environmental changes with the public perception of such changes.

About the Authors

O. A. Anisimov
State hydrological institute.
Russian Federation
St .-Petersburg.


Ye. L. Ziltcova
State hydrological institute.
Russian Federation
St .-Petersburg.


Yu. I. Zhegusov
North-eastern federal university.
Russian Federation
Yakutsk.


References

1. Kattsov V.M., Semenov S.M. Vtoroy otsenochnyi doklad Rosgidrometa ob izmeneniyakh klimata i ikh posledstviyakh na territorii Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchee rezyume. The second assessment report of Roshydromet on climate change and its consequences on the territory of the Russian Federation. General summary. Мoscow: Planeta, 2014: 58 p. [In Russian].

2. Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA): climate change and the cryosphere. Oslo, 2011: 538 p.

3. Anisimov O.A., Kokorev V.A. Climate in the Arctic zone of Russia: analysis of current changes and model projections for the 21st century. Vestnik MGU. Ser. 5. Geografiya. Herald of the Moscow State University. Ser. 5. Geography. 2016, 1: 61–69. [In Russian].

4. Kattsov V.M., Porfir'ev B.N. Otsenka makroekonomicheskikh posledstviy izmeneniy klimata na territorii Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2030 g. i dal'neyshuyu perspektivu. Assessment of the macroeconomic consequences of climate change in the territory of Russian Federation for the period until 2030 and beyond. Мoscow: D'ART, 2011: 254 p. [In Russian].

5. Anisimov O.A., Kokorev V.A. Cities of the Russian North in the context of climate change. Sustaining Russia’s Arctic Cities: Resource Politics, Migration, and Climate Change. Ed. R. Orttung. NY: Berghahn Press, 2016: 141–174.

6. Mel'nikov V.P., Gennadinik V.B. Cryosophy – a system of ideas about the cold world. Kriosfera Zemli. Earth Cryosphere. 2011, 15 (4): 3–8. [In Russian].

7. Hagen B., Middel A., Pijawka D. European climate change perceptions: Public support for mitigation and adaptation policies. Environmental Policy and Governance. 2016, 26 (3): 170–183.

8. Howarth C.C., Sharman A.G. Labeling opinions in the climate debate: a critical review. Climatic Change. 2016, 6 (2): 239–254.

9. Stoutenborough J.W., Liu X., Vedlitz A. Trends in public attitudes toward climate change: The influence of the economy and climategate on risk, information, and public policy. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy. 2014, 5 (1): 22–37.

10. Sibley C.G., Kurz T. A model of climate belief profiles: How much does it matter if people question human causation? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2013, 13 (1): 245–261.

11. Shi J., Visschers V.H.M., Siegrist M., Arvai J. Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed. Nature Climate Change. 2016, 6 (8): 759–762.

12. Rybakova M.V. Sociocultural aspects of the study of adaptation to climate change. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. Sociological research. 2010, (5): 137–140. [In Russian].

13. Zhegusov Y., Ksenofontov S.M., Sugimoto A., Iwahana G. Environmental consciousness of local people of Yakutia under global climate change. Causes, Impacts and Solutions to Global Warming. Eds .: I. Dincer, C .O. Colpan, F. Kadioglu NY: Springer- Verlag, 2013: 251–260.

14. Anisimov O.A. Challenges of the changing climate: A case study of Russia. Russian Analytical Digest. 2016, 185: 2–5. (http://www.css.ethz.ch/en/publications/rad.html)

15. Anisimov O.A., Streletskiy D.A. Geocryological risks in the melting of permafrost soils. Arctic XXI century. Estestvennye nauki. Natural Sciences. 2015, 2: 60–74. [In Russian].

16. Streletskiy D.A., Anisimov O.A., Vasiliev A.A. Permafrost degradation. Snow and ice- related hazards, risks, and disasters. Eds .: W. Haeberli, C. Whiteman. Elsevier. 2014: 303–344.

17. Streletskiy D.A., Shiklomanov N.I., Nelson F.E. Permafrost, infrastructure and climate change: A GIS- based landscape approach to geotechnical modeling. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research. 2012, 44 (3): 368–380.

18. Shiklomanov N.I., Streletskiy D.A., Swales T.B., Kokorev V.A. Climate change and stability of urban infrastructure in Russian permafrost regions: Prognostic assessment based on GCM climate projections. Geographical Review. 2017, 107 (1): 125–142.

19. Anisimov O.A., Zhil'tsova E.L., Razzhivin V.Yu. Modeling of bioproductivity in the Arctic zone of Russia using satellite observations. Issledovaniya Zemli iz Kosmosa. Earth exploration from the Cosmos. 2015, (3): 60–70. [In Russian].

20. Anisimov O.A., Kokorev V.A. Simulation of seasonal thickness with regard to climate and vegetation changes: forecast for the mid- 21st century and uncertainty analysis. Kriosfera Zemli. Earth Cryosphere. 2017, 2: 3–10. [In Russian].

21. Anisimov O.A., Kokorev V.A ., Zhiltcova E.L. Arctic ecosystems and their services under changing climate: predictive modelling assessment. Geographical Review. 2017, 107 (1): 108–124 .


Supplementary files

For citation: Anisimov O.A., Ziltcova Y.L., Zhegusov Y.I. Public perception of climate change in the cold regions of Russia: an example of Yakutia. Ice and Snow. 2017;57(4):565-574. https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2017-4-565-574

Views: 1430

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2076-6734 (Print)
ISSN 2412-3765 (Online)