Calculation of mass discharge of the Greenland ice sheet in the Earth System Model


https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2016-3-293-308

Full Text:




Abstract

Mass discharge calculation is a challenging task for the ice sheet modeling aimed at evaluation of their contribution to the global sea level rise during past interglacials, as well as one of the consequences of future climate change. In Greenland, ablation is the major source of fresh water runoff. It is approximately equal to the dynamical discharge (iceberg calving). Its share might have still larger during the past interglacials when the margins of the GrIS retreated inland. Refreezing of the melted water and its retention are two poorly known processes playing as a counterpart of melting and, thus, exerting influence on the run off. Interaction of ice sheets and climate is driven by energy and mass exchange processes and is complicated by numerous feed-backs. To study the complex of these processes, coupling of an ice sheet model and a climate model (i.e. models of the atmosphere and the ocean) in one model is required, which is often called the Earth System Model (ESM). Formalization of processes of interaction between the ice sheets and climate within the ESM requires elaboration of special techniques to deal with dramatic differences in spatial and temporal variability scales within each of three ESM’s blocks. In this paper, we focus on the method of coupling of a Greenland ice sheet model (GrISM) with the climate model INMCM having been developed in the Institute of Numerical Mathematics of Russian Academy of Sciences. Our coupling approach consists in applying of a special buffer model, which serves as an interface between GrISM and INMCM. A simple energy and water exchange model (EWBM-G) allows realistic description of surface air temperature and precipitation fields adjusted to a relief of elevation of the GrIS surface. In a series of diagnostic numerical experiments with the present-day GrIS geometry and the modeled climate we studied sensitivity of the modeled surface mass balance and run off to the key EWBM-G parameters and compared our results with similar model studies. In addition to the atmospheric, oceanic, and ice sheet blocks the ESM normally contains blocks accounting for dynamics of the biosphere, sea ice, hydrological cycle, etc. In practice, application of ESMs for research studies has become possible not long ago owing to the fast progress in computing facilities. Nevertheless, still now ESMs are rather computer time demanding. To provide long runs of a fully coupled ESM at a lower computational cost, we utilized an asynchronous coupling when a 100-yr run of the GrISM corresponds to 1-yr run of the INMCM. The weak point of the numerical experiments is comparison of the results with observations. The lack of observations in Greenland and significant inter-annual variability of air temperature, precipitation, surface melting, and run off do not allow formulation of a reliable reference «climate» and corresponding equilibrium state of GrIS. In practice it means that more or less accurate estimates of the past or future changes of the runoff and total GrIS mass discharge is reasonable to obtain in the form of deviations from a reference undisturbed model state.

About the Authors

O. O. Rybak
Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences:Branch of the Institute of Natural and Technical Systems
Russian Federation

Moscow;

Sochi



E. M. Volodin
Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow


A. P. Nevecherya
Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences; Kuban State University
Russian Federation

Moscow;

Krasnodar



P. A. Morozova
Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow


M. M. Кaminskaya
Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow


References

1. Gates W.L. The numerical simulation of ice-age climate with a global general circulation model. Journ. of Atmospheric Science. 1976, 33: 1844–1873.

2. Adem J. Numerical experiments on ice age climates. Climate Dynamics. 1981, 3: 155–171.

3. Gallée H., Van Ypersele J.P., Fichefet T., Tricot Ch., Berger A. Simulation of the Last Glacial Cycle by a coupled, sectorial averaged climate-ice sheet model: 2. Response to insolation and CO2 variations. Journ. of Geophys. Research. 1992, 97: 15713–15740.

4. Calov R., Ganapolski A., Petoukhov V., Claussen M. Large-scale instabilities of the Laurentide ice sheet simulated in a fully coupled climate-system model. Geophys. Research Letters. 2002, 29: doi:10.1029/2002GL016078.

5. Adem J. Low resolution thermodynamic grid models. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans. 1979, 3: 433–451.

6. Robinson A., Calov R., Ganopolski A. An efficient regional energy-moisture balance model for simulation of the Greenland Ice Sheet response to climate change. The Cryosphere. 2010, 4: 129–144.

7. Roche D.M., Dumas C., Bügelmayer M., Chabrit S., Ritz C. Adding a dynamical cryosphere to iLOVECLIM (version 1.0): coupling with the GRISLI ice-sheet model. Geoscientific Model Development. 2014, 7: 1377–1394.

8. Huybrechts P. Sea-level changes at the LGM from ice-dynamic reconstructions of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets during the glacial cycles. Quaternary Science Reviews. 2002, 21: 203–231.

9. Huybrechts. P., de Wolde J. The Dynamic Response of the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets to Multiple-Century Climatic Warming. Journ. of Climate. 1999, 12: 2169–2188.

10. Rybak О.О., Volodin Е.М. Use of energy and water balance model for incorporation of the cryospheric component into a climatic model. Part I. Description of the model and simulated fields of surface air temperature and precipitation. Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2015, 11: 33–45. [Iin Russian].

11. Rybak О.О., Volodin Е.М., Nevecherja А.P., Morozova P.A. Applying of an energy- and water balance model for incorporation of the cryospheric component into a climatic model. Part II. Modelled mass balance on the surface of the Greenland ice sheet. Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2016, 6: 5–16. [In Russian].

12. Ettema J., van den Broeke M.R., van Meijgaard E., van de Berg W.J., Box J.E., Steffen K. Climate of the Greenland ice sheet using a high-resolution climate model – Part 1: Evaluation. The Cryosphere. 2010, 4: 511–527.

13. Fausto R.S., Ahlstrøm A.P., Van As D. Bøggild C.E., Johnsen S.J. A new present-day temperature parameterization for Greenland. Journ. of Glaciology. 2009, 55: 95–105.

14. Petoukhov V., Ganopolski A., Brovkin V., Claussen M., Eliseev A., Kubatzki C., Rahmstorf S. CLIMBER-2: a climate system model of intermediate complexity. Part I: model description and performance for present climate. Climate Dynamics. 2000, 16: 1–17.

15. Rignot E., Kanagaratnam P. Changes in the Velocity Structure of the Greenland Ice Sheet, Science. 2006, 311: 986–990.

16. Ettema J., van den Broeke M.R., van Meijgaard E., van de Berg W.J. Climate of the Greenland ice sheet using a high-resolution climate model – Part 2: Near surface climate and energy balance. The Cryosphere. 2010, 4: 529–544.

17. Steffen K., Box J. Surface climatology of the Greenland ice sheet: Greenland Climate Network 1995–1999. Journ. of Geophys. Research. 2001, 106: A33951–33964.

18. Braithwaite R.J., Olesen O.B. A simple energy-balance model to calculate ice ablation at the margin of the Greenland ice sheet. Journ. of Glaciology. 1990, 36: 222–228.

19. Janssens I., Huybrechts P. The treatment of meltwater retention in mass-balance parameterizations of the Greenland ice sheet. Annals of Glaciology. 2000, 31: 133–140.

20. Oerlemans J. The mass balance of the Greenland ice sheet: sensitivity to climate change as revealed by energy-balance modeling. The Holocene. 1991, 1: 40–49.

21. Reijmer C.H., van den Broeke M.R., Fettweis X., Ettema J., Stap L.B. Refreezing on the Greenland ice sheet: a comparison of parameterizations. The Cryosphere. 2012, 6: 743–762.

22. Holland D.M., Thomas R.H., De Young B., Ribergaard M.H., Lyberth B. Acceleration of Jakobshavn Isbræ triggered by warm subsurface ocean waters. Nature Geoscience. 2008, 1: doi:10.1038/ngeo316.

23. Paterson W.S.B. The physics of glaciers, 3rd edition. Oxford et al.: Elsevier, 1994: 480 p.

24. Ohmura A., Reeh N. New precipitation and accumulation map for Greenland. Journ. of Glaciology. 1991, 37: 140–148.

25. Bamber J.L., Ekholm S., Krabill W.B. A new, high resolution digital elevation model of Greenland fully validated with airborne laser altimeter data. Journ. of Geophys. Research. 2001, 106: 6733–6745.

26. Rybak О.О., Volodin Е.М., Nevecherja А.P. Geothermal heat flux in Greenland and its influence upon the ice sheet model topography. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2015, 55 (4): 19–34. [In Russian].


Supplementary files

For citation: Rybak O.O., Volodin E.M., Nevecherya A.P., Morozova P.A., Кaminskaya M.M. Calculation of mass discharge of the Greenland ice sheet in the Earth System Model. Ice and Snow. 2016;56(3):293-308. https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2016-3-293-308

Views: 1032

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2076-6734 (Print)
ISSN 2412-3765 (Online)