Changes in water regime in the high-mountain region of the Terek River (North Caucasus) in connection with climate change and degradation of glaciation


https://doi.org/10.31857/S2076673424020014

Full Text:




Abstract

   In this study, we adapted the ECOMAG model of the runoff formation for analysis of the Terek River basin using comprehensive hydrometeorological information as well as data on soils, landscape, and
glaciation. To take account of regional characteristics of the glaciation, the additional ice module was used with the model. This improvement has resulted in a satisfactory agreement between the modeled runoff hydrographs and the observed ones. In our simulations we used the updated glacier cover predictions from the- global glaciological model GloGEMflowdebris together with regional climate projections from the CORDEX experiment to determine possible future changes in the Terek River flow in the 21st century. The results show that the runoff will change between −2 % and +5 % according to the RCP2.6 scenario, and from −8 % to +14 % in the RCP8.5 scenario. The directedness of the runoff changes in particular subbasins of the River will essentially depend on the altitude position of the snow and glacier feeding zones, that is responsible for the intensity of their degradation. Thus, in the RCP8.5 scenario, the flow of the Chegem River will begin to decrease significantly in the second half of the 21st century. In contrast, the predicted increasing of the runoff in Malka and Baksan rivers, which are primarily fed by meltwater from glaciers and snow on Elbrus and other high-mountain zones, is expected to be continued until the end of the century. But this increase may be caused only by a growth of a part of the snowmelt feeding due to greater winter precipitation. The model estimates confirm the present-day observed trends within the intra-annual runoff distribution, demonstrating the earlier start of the spring flood, a decrease in summer runoff volumes and then its increase in the autumn months. The results of the research may be used for more efficient management of water resources in the North Caucasus in the future, including electricity generation and water supply.

About the Authors

E. D. Kornilova
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow


I. N. Krylenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow


E. P. Rets
Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow


Yu. G. Motovilov
Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Natural and Technical Systems
Russian Federation
Moscow


I. A. Korneva
Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow; Sevastopol


T. N. Postnikova
Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow


O. O. Rybak
Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Natural and Technical Systems
Russian Federation
Moscow; Sevastopol


References

1. Borsch S. V., Simonov Y. A., Khristoforov A. V. Prognozirovanie stoka rek Rossii. Streamflow forecasting in Russia. Moscow: Hydrometcenter of Russia, 2023: 200 p. [In Russian]

2. Korneva I.A., Pybak O.O., Rybak E.A. Climate projections for Central Caucasus (CORDEX experiment results). Sistemy kontrolya okruzhayushchej sredy. Monitoring systems of environment. 2020, 4: 5–12. [In Russian]

3. Korneva I. A., Pybak O. O. Correction of the model climatic data for simualtion of the Central Caucasus mountain glaciers. Sistemy kontrolya okruzhayushchej sredy. Monitoring systems of environment. 2024, 1 [In Russian] (in print)

4. Korovin V. I., Galkin G.A. Genetic structure of floods and flash-floods in the Western North Caucasus during 275 years. Izvestija Akademii Nauk of SSSR. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 1979, 3: 90–94. [In Russian]

5. Motovilov Yu.G., Gelfan A. N. Modeli formirovaniya stoka v zadachax gidrologii rechnyx bassejnov. Models of runoff formation in problems of river basin hydrology. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, 2018: 300 p. [In Russian]. doi: 10.31857/S9785907036222000001

6. Nosenko G.A., Khromova T.E., Rototaeva O.V., Shakhgedanova M.V. Glacier reaction to temperature and precipitation change in Central Caucasus, 2001–2010. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2013, 53 (1): 26–33. [In Russian]. doi: 10.15356/2076-6734-2013-1-26-33

7. Adler C., Huggel C., Orlove B., Nolin A. Climate change in the mountain cryosphere: impacts and responses. Regional Environmental Change. 2019, 19: 1225–1228. doi: 10.1007/s10113-019-01507-6

8. Bliss A., Hock R., Radić V. Global response of glacier runoff to twenty-first century climate change. Journ. of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. 2014, 119 (4): 717–730. doi: 10.1002/2013JF002931

9. Duethmann D., Bolch T., Farinotti D., Kriegel D., Vorogushyn S., Merz B., Pieczonka T., Jiang T., Su B., Güntner A. Attribution of streamflow trends in snow and glacier melt-dominated catchments of the Tarim River, Central Asia. Water Resources Research. 2015, 51 (6): 4727–4750. doi: 10.1002/2014WR016716

10. Gelfan A., Semenov V.A., Gusev E., Motovilov Y., Nasonova O., Krylenko I., Kovalev E. Large-basin hydrological response to climate model outputs: uncertainty caused by internal atmospheric variability. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2015, 19 (6): 2737–2754. doi: 10.5194/hess-19-2737-2015

11. Hagg W., Shahgedanova M., Mayer C., Lambrecht A., Popovnin V. A sensitivity study for water availability in the Northern Caucasus based on climate projections. Global and Planetary Change. 2010, 73 (3–4):161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.05.005.

12. Hamed K.H., Rao A.R. A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. Journ. of hydrology. 1998, 204 (1–4): 182–196. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00125-X

13. Huss M., Fischer M. Sensitivity of very small glaciers in the Swiss Alps to future climate change. Frontiers in Earth Science. 2016, 4: 34. doi: 10.3389/feart.2016.00034

14. Jones J.A. Hydrologic responses to climate change: considering geographic context and alternative hypotheses. Hydrological Processes. 2011, 25 (12): 1996–2000. doi: 10.1002/hyp.8004

15. Kraainjenbrink P.D.A., Bierkens M.F.P., Lutz A.F., Immerzeel W.W. Impact of a global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius on Asia’s glaciers. Nature. 2017, 549: 257–260. doi: 10.1038/nature23878

16. Kutuzov S., Lavrentiev I., Smirnov A., Nosenko G., Petrakov D. Volume changes of Elbrus glaciers from 1997 to 2017. Frontiers in Earth Science. 2019, 7: 153. doi: 10.3389/feart.2019.00153

17. Lüthi S., Ban N., Kotlarski S., Steger C.R., Jonas T., Schär C. Projections of alpine snow-cover in a high-resolution climate simulation. Atmosphere. 2019, 10 (8): 463. doi: 10.3390/atmos10080463

18. Marty C., Schlögl S., Bavay M., Lehning M. How much can we save? Impact of different emission scenarios on future snow cover in the Alps. The Cryosphere. 2017, 11 (1): 517–529. doi: 10.5194/tc-11-517-2017

19. Milner A. M., Khamis K., Battin T. J., Brittain J. E., Barrand N. E., Füreder L., Cauvy-Fraunié S., Gíslason G.M., Jacobsen D., Hannah D.M., Hodson A.J., Hood E., Lencioni V., Ólafsson J. S., Robinson C.T., Tranter M., Brown L.E. Glacier shrinkage driving global changes in downstream systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017, 114 (37): P. 9770–9778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619807114

20. Motovilov Yu., Gottschalk L., Engeland K., Belokurov A. ECOMAG – regional model of hydrological cycle. Application to the NOPEX region. Department of Geophysics, University of Oslo, 1999: 88.

21. Omani N., Srinivasan R., Karthikeyan R., Smith P. Hydrological modeling of highly glacierized basins (Andes, Alps, and Central Asia). Water. 2017, 9 (2): 111. doi: 10.3390/w9020111

22. Pellicciotti F., Bauder A., Parola M. Effect of glaciers on streamflow trends in the Swiss Alps. Water Resources Research. 2010, 46 (10): 1–16. doi: 10.1029/2009WR009039

23. Postnikova T., Rybak O., Gubanov A., Zekollari H., Huss M., Shahgedanova M. Debris cover effect on the evolution of Northern Caucasus glaciers in the 21<sup>st</sup> century. Frontiers in Earth Science. 2023, 11 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1256696

24. Rafiq M., Mishra A. Investigating changes in Himalayan glacier in warming environment: a case study of Kolahoi glacier. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2016, 75: 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-6282-1

25. Rahman K., Maringanti C., Beniston M., Widmer F., Abbaspour K., Lehmann A. Streamflow modeling in a highly managed mountainous glacier watershed using SWAT: the Upper Rhone River watershed case in Switzerland. Water resources management. 2013, 27 (2): 323–339. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0188-9

26. Rets E.P., Durmanov I.N., Kireeva M.B. Peak runoff in the north Caucasus: Recent trends in magnitude, variation and timing. Water Resources. 2019, 46 (1): 56–66. doi: 10.1134/S0097807819070157.

27. Rets E.P., Durmanov I. N., Kireeva M.B., Smirnov A. M., Popovnin V.V. Past ‘peak water’ in the North Caucasus: Deglaciation drives a reduction in glacial runoff impacting summer river runoff and peak discharges. Climatic Change. 2020, 163 (4): 2135–2151. doi: 10.1007/s10584-020-02931-y

28. Rets E., Kireeva M. Hazardous hydrological processes in mountainous areas under the impact of recent climate change: case study of Terek River basin. IAHS Publ. 2010, 340: 126–134.

29. RGI 6.0 Consortium, 2017. Randolph Glacier Inventory – A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines, Version 6.0. Boulder, Colorado USA. NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center. Retrieved from: https://nsidc.org/data/nsidc-0770/versions/6 (Last access: 26 February 2023). doi: 10.5067/f6jmovy5navz

30. Santer B. D., Wigley T. M. L., Boyle J. S., Gaffen D. J., Hnilo J. J., Nychka D., Parker D.E., Taylor K.E. Statistical significance of trends and trend differences. Journ. of Geophys. Research. 2000, 105 (6): 7337–7356. doi: 10.1029/1999JD901105

31. Shahgedanova M., Hagg W., Zacios M., Popovnin V. An Assessment of the recent past and future climate change, glacier retreat, and runoff in the caucasus region using dynamical and statistical downscaling and HBVETH hydrological model. Regional Aspects of Climate-Terrestrial-Hydrologic Interactions in Non-boreal Eastern Europe. 2009: 63–72. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2283-7_8

32. Singh V., Jain S.K., Shukla S.K. Glacier change and glacier runoff variation in the Himalayan Baspa River basin. Journ. of Hydrology. 2021, 593: 125918 doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125918

33. Tashilova A., Ashabokov B., Kesheva L., Teunova N. Analysis of climate change in the Caucasus region: End of the 20<sup>th</sup> – Beginning of the 21<sup>st</sup> Century. Climate. 2019, 7 (11). doi: 10.3390/cli7010011

34. Tielidze L.G., Wheate R. D. The Greater Caucasus Glacier Inventory (Russia, Georgia and Azerbaijan). The Cryosphere. 2018, 12 (1): 81–94. doi: 10.5194/tc-12-81-2018

35. Tielidze L.G., Jomelli V., Nosenko G. A. Analysis of Regional Changes in Geodetic Mass Balance for All Caucasus Glaciers over the Past Two Decades. Atmosphere. 2022, 13 (2): 256. doi: 10.3390/atmos13020256

36. Toropov P.A., Aleshina M.A., Grachev A.M. Large-scale climatic factors driving glacier recession in the Greater Caucasus, 20<sup>th</sup> – 21<sup>st</sup> century. International Journ. of Climatology. 2019, 39 (12): 4703–4720. doi: 10.1002/joc.6101

37. Vacco D.A., Alley R.B., Pollard D. Glacier advance and stagnation caused by rock avalanches. Earth Planet. Sc. Lett. 2010, 294: 123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.03.019

38. Verhaegen Y., Huybrechts P., Rybak O. and Popovnin V. Modelling the evolution of Djankuat Glacier, North Caucasus, from 1752 until 2100 CE. The Cryosphere. 2020, 14 (11): 4039–4061. doi: 10.5194/tc-14-4039-2020

39. Zekollari H., Huss M., Farinotti D. Modelling the future evolution of glaciers in the European Alps under the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble. The Cryosphere. 2019, 13 (4): 1125–1146. doi: 10.1029/2019gl085578


Supplementary files

For citation: Kornilova E.D., Krylenko I.N., Rets E.P., Motovilov Y.G., Korneva I.A., Postnikova T.N., Rybak O.O. Changes in water regime in the high-mountain region of the Terek River (North Caucasus) in connection with climate change and degradation of glaciation. Ice and Snow. 2024;64(2):173-188. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2076673424020014

Views: 176

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2076-6734 (Print)
ISSN 2412-3765 (Online)