The Influence of Climate Changes on Mudflow Formation in Permafrost Areas: a Case Study for Chukotka Peninsula


https://doi.org/10.31857/S2076673423020060

Full Text:




Abstract

The factors influencing the formation of mudflows in areas of the permafrost are considered. The data of studies performed in two regions of Chukotka – “Continental” (the Anyuysky ridge) and “Coastal” (the Iskaten ridge) were used for this research. The air temperature data series obtained in Chukotka in 2000–2020 demonstrate a steady growth of the average annual values. The air temperature rise estimated for the mudflow–dangerous period (June–August) amounted 1.4°C for the “Continental” area, and 1.0°C for the “Coastal”. This warming affects thickness of the seasonal melt layer of permafrost, mainly in the bottoms of valleys and on the slopes of mountains. This factor promotes the involvement of certain volumes of ground into mudflows. As a result of the research, it was found that the dynamics of the change in the thickness of the seasonal melt layer within the studied areas is positive, which is a consequence of warming and leads to additional moistening of grounds. The two periods of the mudflow formation were identified. During the first one (May–June), the mudflow formation is connected with the onset of intensive snowmelt that is favorable mainly for snow-water streams and loose mudflows. In the second period (July–August), mudflows are mostly caused by liquid precipitations, when the maximum thickness of seasonal melt layer is reached. It is the second period when a release of a large cohesive mud stream is the most probable. On the whole, the results obtained allow making a conclusion that in the near future the predominant type of mudflows in Chukotka will remain those of snow genesis. But, at the same time, under conditions of the climate change, occurrence of the snow-water mud streams will increase, especially in the “Coastal” area.

About the Authors

Yu. V. Gensiorovskiy
Far East Geological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sakhalin Branch
Russian Federation
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk


V. A. Lobkina
Far East Geological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sakhalin Branch
Russian Federation
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk


A. A. Muzychenko
Far East Geological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sakhalin Branch
Russian Federation
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk


L. E. Muzychenko
Far East Geological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sakhalin Branch
Russian Federation
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk


M. V. Mikhalev
Far East Geological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sakhalin Branch
Russian Federation
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk


N. N. Ukhova
Institute of the Earth’s Crust of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Irkutsk


References

1. Ananicheva M.D., Karpachevskiy A.M. Current state of the Kolyma and Chukchi glaciers and projection of the evolution of Chukchi Highlands’ glacial systems. Fundamental’naya i prikladnaya klimatologiya. Fundamental and Applied Climatology. 2016, 1: 64–83 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.21513/2410-8758-2016-1-64-83

2. Gensiorovskiy Yu.V., Lobkina V.A., Muzychenko L.E., Muzychenko A.A., Mikhalev M.V., Stepnova Yu.A. Debris flow formation conditions in the north-east of Russia. Georisk. GeoRisk World. 2020, XIV (3): 68–76 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.25296/1997-8669-2020-14-3-68-76

3. Egorov Ya.A., Busygina E.N., Rasskazov A.A. The change of permafrost-hydrogeological conditions around the Bilibino Nuclear Power Plant at the stage of its operation, The Scientific portal “The Atomic Energy 2.0”. Retrieved from: https://www.atomic-energy.ru (Last access: 17 August 2022). [In Russian].

4. Zyuzin Y.L. Vodosnezhnye potoki, in Surovyj Lik Hibin. The slushflows, in Harsh Face of Khibin. Murmansk: Advertising printing, 2006: 182–197. [In Russian].

5. Kotov A.N. Mnogoletnemerzlye porody. Priroda i Resursy Chukotki. Permanently frozen ground, in the nature and resources of Chukotka. Magadan: FEB RAS North-Eastern Research Center, 2006: 31–40 [In Russian].

6. Maslakov A.A., Belova N.G., Baranskaya A.V., Romanenko F.A. The embedded ice of the eastern Chukotka Peninsula coast in conditions of climate warming: some results of expeditions in 2014–2018. Arktika i Antarktika. Arctic and Antarctic. 2018, 74: 30–43 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.7256/2453-8922.2018.4.28528

7. Perov V.F. Selevedenie. The mudflow studies. Moscow: MSU, 2012: 272. [In Russian].

8. Polar Bulletin. Retrieved from: http://norilsk-zv.ru/articles/vodnye_momenty.html (Last access: 19 August 2022). [In Russian].

9. Romanenko F.A. Celevye potoki na ostrovah i poberezh’yah arkticheskih morej. Debris flows on the islands and coasts of the Arctic seas. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference Debris Flows: Disasters, Risk, Forecast, Protection, Tbilisi, Georgia, 1–5 October 2018. Tbilisi: Publishing House “Universal”, 2018: 521–528 [In Russian].

10. Rudich K.N. Teplo i holod Severa. The warmth and coldness of the North. Moscow: Nauka, 1985: 80 [In Russian].

11. Sapunova G.G., Sapunov V.N. Mekhanizm i usloviya obrazovaniya vodosnezhnyh potokov rannevesennih ottepelej (na primere Hibin), in Snezhnye Laviny, Seli i Ocenka Riska. Mechanism and conditions of slushflow formation during early-spring thaws (case study of the Khibiny Mountains), in Snow avalanches, mudflows and risk assessment. Moscow: MSU, 2004: 59–71 [In Russian].

12. Sever Dal’nego Vostoka. North of the Far East. Moscow: Nauka, 1970: 488 [In Russian].

13. Sedov R.V. Ledniki hrebta Iskaten’. Materialy glyaciologicheskih issledovanij. Glaciers of the Iskaten Ridge. Data of Glaciological Studies. 1988. 62: 129–133 [In Russian].

14. Tibilov I.V. Blagoslovennye vremena prezrennogo zastoia: Chukotskie byli. Blessed times of despicable stagnation: Chukchi were. Sankt-Petersburg: Duma, issue 2, enlarged edition, 2007: 544 [In Russian].

15. Fleishman S.M., Perov V.F. Seli. The mudflows. Moscow: MSU, 1986: 126 [In Russian].

16. Chernous P.A., Volkov A.V., Sokolova D.P. Prognozirovanie vozniknoveniya vodosnezhnyh potokov. Slushflow release forecasting. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference Debris Flows: Disasters, Risk, Forecast, Protection, Tbilisi, Georgia, 1–5 October 2018. Tbilisi: Publishing House “Universal”, 2018: 624–630 [In Russian].

17. Anderson D.M., Reynolds R.C., Brown J. Bentonite debris flows in Northern Alaska. Science. 1969, 164 (3876): 173–174. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3876.173

18. Beylich A., Sandberg O. Geomorphic effects of the extreme rainfall event of 20–21 july 2004 in the Latnjavagge catchment, northern Swedish Lapland. Geografiska Annaler. Series A. Physical Geography. 2005, 87 (3): 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3676.2005.00267.x

19. Biskaborn B.K., Smith S.L., Noetz L.J. Permafrost is warming at а global scale. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10: 264–275.

20. Decaulne A., Sæmundsson Þ., Petursson O. Debris flow triggered by rapid snowmelt: a case study in the Gleiarhjalli area, northwestern Iceland. Geografiska Annaler. Series A. Physical Geography. 2005, 87 (4): 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3676.2005.00273.x

21. Evans S.G., Clague J.J. Rain-induced landslides in the Canadian Cordillera, July 1988. Geos. Canada. 1989, 16: 193–200.

22. Gude M., Scherer D. Snowmelt and slushflows: hydrological and hazard implications. Annales of Glaciology. 1998, 26: 381–384.

23. Hestnes E. Slushflow hazard – Where, why and when? 25 years of consulting and research. Annales of Glaciology. 1998, 26: 370–376.

24. Hjort J., Karjalainen O., Aalto J., Westermann S., Romanovsky V., Nelson F., Etzelmuller B., Luoto M. Degrading permafrost puts Arctic infrastructure at risk by mid-century. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1): 5147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07557-4

25. Hughes O.L., Rampton V.L., Rutter N.W. Quaternary geology and geomorphology, southern and central Yukon (N Canada). Proc. of the XXIV Intern. Geological Congress. Montreal, 1972: 374.

26. Larsson S. Geomorphological еffects on the slopes of Long-year Valley, Spitsbergen, after a Heavy Rainstorm in July 1972. Geografiska Annaler. Series A. Physical Geography. 1982, 64 (3–4): 105–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/520639

27. Rapp A., Nyberg R. Alpine debris flows in Northern Scandinavia. Morphology and dating by lichenometry. Geografiska Annaler. Series A. Physical Geography. 1981, 63 (3–4): 183–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/520831

28. Sidorova T., Belaya N., Perov V. Distribution of slushflows in Northern Europe and their potential change due to global warming. Annales of Glaciology. 2001, 32: 237– 240. https://doi.org/10.3189/172756401781819742

29. snegohod.org. Retrieved from: https://snegohod.org.ru/html/articles_science_05.htm (Last access: 03 September 2022) [In Russian].

30. Streletskiy D., Anisimov O., Vasiliev A. Permafrost degradation. Snow and Ice-Related Hazards, Risks and Disasters. New York: Elsevier, 2015: 303–344.


Supplementary files

For citation: Gensiorovskiy Y.V., Lobkina V.A., Muzychenko A.A., Muzychenko L.E., Mikhalev M.V., Ukhova N.N. The Influence of Climate Changes on Mudflow Formation in Permafrost Areas: a Case Study for Chukotka Peninsula. Ice and Snow. 2023;63(2):271-282. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2076673423020060

Views: 218

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2076-6734 (Print)
ISSN 2412-3765 (Online)

Vavilova St. 37 Moscow 117312 Russia
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences
Tel. +7 (499) 124-73-82

##about.privacyPolicyCommon##
supported by NEICON (Elpub lab)